Chapter IX. Strategic Implications (The Raymond Method in Action)
- john raymond
- Aug 25
- 4 min read
This chapter states the strategic consequences of a theory that treats President Trump, Vladimir Putin, and the wider autocratic axis as engaged in a global war conducted across politics, law, finance, information, and culture.
The theory rests on three main pillars, and a power equation. A fourth pillar specifies what free societies must do to prevail.
The operative method is minimax: assume the enemy seeks to maximize harm over time and choose actions that minimize the enemy’s maximum achievable harm while preserving allied initiative.
Pillar One: Regime Survival Explains the Lies
Autocrats lie because survival requires it. Every move is scored against regime security, not public welfare or legal coherence. When truth threatens the regime, truth becomes the enemy; institutions are pressured to conform; history is rewritten; enemies are invented.
Implications
Expect all messaging, diplomacy, appointments, and prosecutions to converge on a singular aim: regime preservation.
Judge actions by effects, not proclamations. If an act increases regime security—even when dressed as reform—it is part of the war plan.
Indicators
Purges and loyalty oaths; legal exceptionalism; retroactive “exonerations”; pressure on independent referees (courts, auditors, election officials).
Sudden doctrinal pivots rationalized as continuity; narratives that invert causality to justify force.
Counter
Strip narratives to their survival payoff. Publicly map each move to the specific survival lever it fortifies (money, manpower, media, law).
Pillar Two: Lies as Asymmetric Weapons
Deceit is cheap; refutation is costly. The firehose model—high volume, multi-channel, shameless repetition—overloads adjudication, creating fatigue that functions like censorship.
Implications
Treat propaganda as maneuver, not debate. Timing, channel selection, and audience segmentation are operational choices.
Expect the adversary to aim for our adjudicative choke points: newsroom capacity, court calendars, platform moderation, academic review.
Indicators
Volume spikes around decision nodes; synchronized euphemisms; laundering of origin through “local” amplifiers; immediate counternarratives after damaging facts surface.
Counter
Pre-bunk with baselines; define nulls in advance; require mechanism with every public claim; publish scorecards so retractions do not erase truth.
Pillar Three: Betrayal as Force Multiplier
The decisive terrain is inside the gates...
Capture or intimidate a small set of insiders and the regime gains lawful-looking pathways to unlawful ends: selective enforcement, permissive interpretations, procedural sandbagging.
Implications
The marginal official (general counsel, parliamentarian, clerk, platform policy lead) can have strategic weight equal to battalions.
Expect lawfare that weaponizes delay, venue, and discovery to exhaust opponents.
Indicators
Loyalty filtering in appointments; sudden reinterpretations of standing rules; budget squeezes on oversight; gag orders on internal dissent.
Counter
Harden chokepoints: tenure protections, transparent dockets, mandatory publication of rule interpretations, anticapture audits, whistleblower safe lanes.
The Power Equation: Harm Over Time, P = H / T
The war’s objective function is cumulative harm. The enemy’s rational play is to maximize the integral of harm across time, often through many small moves that compound.
Implications
Score policies by what they enable downstream, not by their surface rhetoric.
Prefer actions that cut compounding curves at their base: deny sanctuary, choke finance, disrupt logistics, expose networks early.
Metrics
Series, not snapshots: enforcement rates, depletion curves, latency from authorization to effect, cadence of IO spikes, time-to-court and time-to-verdict.
The Fourth Pillar: Democratic Counter-Doctrine
Free societies win by method, not by mirroring.
1) Truth Discipline
Institutionalize structural empiricism: baselines, mechanism memos, pre-registered forecasts, and public scoring for government communications.
Excise euphemism in official labeling; require plain-language justifications tied to measurable outcomes.
2) Institutional Immunization
Seal critical posts from patronage; publish conflict maps for appointees; rotate sensitive functions to deny capture; enforce bright-line recusals.
3) Offensive Transparency
Declassify with intent: timed releases that expose mechanisms of corruption or foreign influence; publish financial flows as series; open-source sanitized evidence for civil society replication.
4) Economic and Legal Chokepoints
Target enabling nodes: shell companies, payment rails, shippers, insurers, shadow brokers. Make participation in malign networks reputational and financial poison.
Accelerate legal process for alliance-harm cases with specialist benches and statutory fast lanes.
5) Alliance Compounding
Convert coalitions into machinery: synchronized sanctions clocks; pooled enforcement teams; joint attribution and simultaneous public briefings.
6) Civic Inoculation
Teach citizens to ask three questions of every claim: where is the baseline, what is the mechanism, what near-term prediction follows? Equip audiences to become analysts.
Minimax in Practice
Assume the adversary chooses moves that maximize harm over time. We respond by minimizing the maximum harm the adversary can still achieve—without conceding initiative.
Procedure
Define the horizon and unit of account (quarters; lives, liberties, resources).
List our feasible actions this horizon (A1…An) and the enemy’s best responses (B1…Bm) to each.
For every Ai, estimate the enemy’s maximum harm trajectory given best response Bj*.
Choose the Ai whose worst-case (enemy-maximized) harm is smallest; execute and instrument it.
Recompute each cycle as new data arrive; update the mechanism and the choice.
Rules of Thumb
Cut enablers before messaging battles; disable compounding before symbolic wins.
Prefer actions that create multiple, independent obstacles for the adversary (finance + law + logistics).
Make every public line falsifiable; force the adversary to lie on the record, then use that lie to narrow their future options.
An Example Operational Checklist
Decision nodes: identify the next three leverage points and the two fastest ways the adversary can poison each.
Pre-bunk packets: baseline, mechanism, nulls, metrics; cleared for immediate release on Day-1.
Enforcement clocks: start-to-impact timers for sanctions, seizures, prosecutions; escalate any clock that stalls.
Insider audits: capture-risk review for key posts; rotate or reinforce as indicated.
The End State
The strategic terrain clarifies: the autocratic axis pursues survival by maximizing harm over time through lies, institutional betrayal, and exploitation of alliance adjudicative bottlenecks.
Good prevail not by louder rhetoric but by disciplined method—structural empiricism in public, hardening of chokepoints inside institutions, and minimax execution that denies the enemy compounding advantages.
This is the doctrine that keeps the web of truth intact while the war continues.
Comments