Decoding Trump’s UN Speech: Part 1 — UN-Funded Migration as a Political Weapon
- john raymond
- Sep 24, 2025
- 2 min read
President Trump’s September 23 address to the United Nations was not a policy speech so much as a weaponized performance. He selected certain fracture points in the Western world. Migration was his opening blow.
He called migration “the number one political issue of our time,” warning delegates, “Your countries are being ruined.” He went further, claiming that the UN itself was “funding an assault on Western countries and their borders,” and he cited a precise figure to give the charge credibility:
“In 2024, the UN budgeted $372 million in cash assistance… provided… debit cards to illegal aliens.” Each element of this construction was designed not only to inflame but to direct the anger of domestic and international audiences against multilateral institutions.
The tactic follows the Raymond Method’s pillars precisely.
Under Pillar One (Regime Security), Trump identifies an “external institutional villain” in the UN, while simultaneously casting migrants—especially those from the Global South—as existential threats. This posture is not accidental; it plays into a broader strategy of encouraging Western electorates to choose nationalist strongmen like himself, who, once in power, are easier for Trump and the Kremlin to manipulate.
Pillar Two (Asymmetric Warfare) emerges as Trump reframes humanitarian relief pipelines as instruments of attack. Cash assistance programs, designed to prevent starvation and stabilize displaced families, are recast as hostile operations undermining sovereignty. And rather than de-escalate the political firestorms around migration, he pours accelerant, telling governments to reject humanitarian frameworks in favor of closed-border extremism.
The broader significance lies in how migration functions as a division point in the European Union. Immigration cleaves party systems, topples governments, and provides fertile ground for populists across the continent. Trump knows this. By accusing the UN of underwriting border assaults, he is not merely criticizing policy—he is deliberately destabilizing the political balance of Europe.
He wants Berlin, Paris, Rome, and others to wobble toward nationalist-populists who mirror his own movement. Such a shift would splinter NATO unity, weaken Brussels, and tilt the Western coalition toward dysfunction.
This dynamic serves the interests of Moscow. A fractured EU and NATO reduce the ability of the West to hold the line against Russian aggression. Every populist victory in Europe undercuts liberal-democratic resilience, and every accusation against the UN chips away at multilateral solidarity.
This is why Trump’s remarks cannot be dismissed as careless or theatrical. They are part of a coordinated destabilization strategy that exports MAGA logic abroad, magnifies existing EU divides, and provides a political dividend for his master in the Kremlin.
In this sense, migration is not just a talking point; it is the spearhead of asymmetric attack on the Western alliance itself.
Comments