Signaling Willingness to Send Troops After a Peace Deal or Ceasefire Is Good, Because It Is Just One Step Away from Sending Them Before
- john raymond
- Sep 4
- 3 min read
Europe’s pledge to send troops to Ukraine after a ceasefire or peace deal is more than symbolic restraint. It is an operational milestone.
Declaring troops for “after” presupposes that forces are already organized, positioned, and prepared—which in practice means some are present before. Once troops exist as a deployable force, the decision to move them forward is only a command away.
The deeper truth is that Ukraine’s fate is Europe’s fate. If Ukraine falls, Europe does not survive as a project of freedom and democracy.
That reality makes “after” and “before” indistinguishable in the long run.
Declared vs. Undeclared Troops
When leaders say troops will be deployed once peace is signed, they imply a prior stage: preparation. Troops cannot materialize the day after a treaty. They must already be in motion, staging, rehearsing logistics, and in some cases already operating undeclared inside Ukraine.
This means:
Declared “after” troops imply undeclared “before” troops. Preparation is itself presence.
Command authority is not conditional. Once troops are organized, they can be ordered forward at any time. The legal fiction of “after peace” does not bind the hand of a fully empowered supreme allied commander.
Timing is fluid. Leaders can hold to their current word, or they can shift orders if battlefield conditions demand. Either way, the infrastructure of intervention is now real.
The Real Question
Much commentary frames the issue as whether Ukraine can survive without direct European intervention. This is the wrong question. The true question is: Can Europe survive if Ukraine falls? The answer is no.
If Ukraine is destroyed, Europe’s strategic frontier collapses. NATO’s credibility dies. Russian power extends westward, destabilizing Poland, the Baltics, and the Balkans.
Democracies fracture under refugee crises, propaganda, and economic sabotage. European sovereignty itself becomes untenable.
The leaders of Europe must face this: hesitation is existential. To misjudge the stakes is to risk the annihilation of their states and the deaths of their citizens.
Acting Without the United States
This reality is made sharper by the fact that President Trump is a traitor to the project of western democracy. His every move serves Kremlin interests. Europe must plan to act without him and without the United States.
The Paris pledge is therefore more than an addendum to NATO: it is the embryo of a sovereign European defense identity. The EU and NATO members loyal to democracy must recognize their obligation to act independently. Survival now depends on it.
Pillar Analysis (Raymond Method)
Pillar One: Regime Security: Ukraine’s survival is the wall holding back Europe’s collapse. Europe’s regime security is indivisible from Ukraine’s. To confuse the order of dependency is to miscalculate one’s own survival.
Pillar Two: Asymmetric Warfare: By declaring troops for “after,” Europe gains the flexibility to act “before” without announcing it. Ambiguity itself becomes an asymmetric weapon—deterring Russia while preparing Europe for escalation.
Pillar Three: Byzantine Traitor-General: The danger lies not in Russia alone but in internal sabotage—leaders who miscalculate, hesitate, or betray. Those who fail to see that Ukraine’s fall is Europe’s fall are traitors to their own nations, whether through cowardice or delusion.
Enemy-Intent Corollary: Russia already reads the “after” as “before.” Moscow assumes European troops will be drawn in eventually, so it will escalate and probe now. Europe must be prepared to match that logic with its own preemptive readiness.
The True Meaning of Paris
The Paris summit matters because it acknowledged openly what has been true since 2014: European troops must go into Ukraine. By dressing it as “after peace,” leaders gain political cover and buy time. But the substance is irreversible. Once forces are organized, they can be ordered into combat at any moment.
The decisive truth is this: the line between after and before is an illusion. Europe cannot survive Ukraine’s collapse. It must therefore act as though survival requires troops now.
And with the United States under President Trump compromised by the Kremlin, Europe must act without it. The alternative is alliance-wide suicide.
Comments