The Epstein Scandal and the Asymmetric Warfare of MAGA Commentary
- john raymond
- Jul 21
- 3 min read
In a conventional democracy, a scandal detonates with shrapnel flying in every direction. Journalists swarm the facts, politicians take cover or resign, and the press runs on outrage until a new equilibrium is found. But in asymmetric warfare—especially within authoritarian cult systems like MAGA—the explosion is just the beginning of the narrative operation.
When the Epstein bomb went off—when the suggestion emerged that Trump might indeed be named or implicated—there was a brief, carefully staged burst of outrage from MAGA-aligned commentators. Not because they wanted to expose the rot. Not because they suddenly believed in accountability. But because they had to perform outrage to retain audience loyalty.
They understood something crucial: their base was briefly ahead of them in suspicion. If they failed to match that outrage, they risked irrelevance—or worse, betrayal. This is asymmetric discipline. The leader is never questioned directly, but the surrounding system must shape itself to absorb dissent and neutralize it before it grows.
The Three-Stage MAGA Narrative Control Cycle
Initial Shock Response (Performance Outrage) Commentators loudly demand answers. “Where’s the list?” “Why won’t the DOJ release it?” “What are they hiding?” This outrage is not rebellion—it is ritual. It allows MAGA followers to vent, to believe their voices are being heard, while maintaining the boundaries of the cult.
Cooling Period (Narrative Exhaustion) Once the outrage reaches its emotional peak, it is intentionally left unresolved. No clarity. No justice. Just fatigue. The faithful are trained to lose interest, to accept ambiguity as closure. This is classic asymmetric media warfare: delay is denial.
Reabsorption and Reintegration (Back to Trump) Eventually, the same commentators walk back their disgust. They pivot to blaming the deep state. They reframe Trump as the real victim. And in doing so, they provide cover for the base to return to him—not with shame, but with renewed justification. “Of course it looked bad. That’s why the media ran with it. But now we see what was really going on.”
This cycle is not sloppy. It is adaptive. It is how an authoritarian movement survives scandal after scandal without fracturing.
Lies as Weapons, Fatigue as Strategy
In asymmetric warfare, truth is not the battlefield—narrative is. The MAGA world doesn’t win by proving Trump’s innocence. It wins by making the question so convoluted, so tiring, so infused with conflicting signals that the audience stops asking it.
This is the asymmetric strategy of Trump and Putin alike: to flood the field with lies, partial truths, reversals, and false binaries. Not to convince, but to exhaust. When you can’t win the argument, you smother it. And then you pretend the silence is consent.
The MAGA base, already ideologically zombified, is trained to interpret any backlash against Trump as proof of his martyrdom. Commentators know this. Their job isn’t to reveal the truth. It’s to manage the cult’s cognitive dissonance.
Authoritarian Media Under Asymmetric Conditions
Under these conditions, there is no free media in MAGA land. There is only commanded interpretation. And MAGA commentators are not analysts—they are commissars. Their job is not to uncover reality, but to choreograph belief. When the facts grow too damning, they choreograph silence. When silence threatens defection, they choreograph indignation. And when Trump reemerges, they choreograph reconciliation.
It is the performance of dissent, not the substance of it, that defines MAGA’s asymmetric media strategy.
The Asymmetric Warfare Corollary
This is textbook asymmetric warfare. As I’ve written: Lies are not mistakes. They are weapons. Their purpose is not persuasion. It is suppression, disorientation, and obedience. In such systems, truth-tellers are traitors, and sycophants are prophets. The more absurd the claim, the more loyalty it demands. And the more exhausting the scandal, the more useful it can become.
This is how MAGA survives Epstein. Not by explaining it—but by outlasting it.
Comments